How to Lower the House Prices in Taiwan
The expensive
house price is a chronic
problem rooted in Taiwan
like a malignant tumor.
According to the house
price index (住宅價格指數)
given by Taiwanese
Ministry of the Interior
(內政部), the house prices in
Taiwan have been
ascending since 2011 and
barely descend in recent years (see House Price Index in Graph 1). Ironically, based on the statistics collected by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan in Taiwan (行政院主計總處), the average salary of Taiwanese people barely ascends. In March, 2011, the average salary of Taiwanese people is 41,097. In 2020, at the same month, the average salary in Taiwan is 47,750. You may say that the increase of 6,653 NT dollars is quite a lot. However, considering the inflation in currency and the ratio of house price to income(房價所得比), you will find that the situation of the house prices in Taiwan is not optimistic. The ratio of house price to income means how many years a family has to spend on buying a house. According to the global ranking of house price to income ratio in 2020 provided by Numbeo, Taiwan is ranked as number thirteen. The ratio of Taiwan is 23.69 which is much higher than those in lots of developed countries such as United States, Japan, Germany, and so on. Pathetically, on average, Taiwanese people have to spend roughly 23.5 years to buy a house. In other words, the majority of people can’t really possess a house until they are fifty years old. In order to defend the justice of residence, the unreasonable house prices in Taiwan have to be adjusted imperatively.
Graph 1
Background Reasons of the Problem:
What are the exact reasons that caused high house prices in Taiwan? According to the report by Central News Agency(中央通訊社), Central Bank of Republic of China(中華民國中央銀行) accounts that four reasons result in the phenomenon of high house prices in Taiwan: underestimation of real estate tax(房地產稅), reduction of estate and gift tax(遺贈稅), the prosperity of MRT, and speculation of pre-sale houses(預售屋). In the following paragraph, we will further discuss these four reasons.
-- Reason No. 1:
Firstly, because the government tends to underestimate the value of houses, the taxation is much lower than the benefits that the owners get from their houses. Generally speaking, the taxation of houses can be divided into two kinds, which are property tax(持有稅) and tax of income from property transaction(交易所得稅). In the case of property tax, you have to pay it when you possess houses. As for the tax of income from property transaction, you have to pay it when you have transaction of houses. The government levies taxes through multiplying the assessment of the house prices by the percentage of the tax rate. According to the law, the tax rate of property tax is 1.2 or around 1.5 to 3.6 percent, and the tax rate of tax of income from property transaction is between 15 to 45 percent. The former political deputy minister(前政務次長) of Taiwanese Ministry of the Interior, Hua Jing Qun (2014), once indicated that the assessment of houses made by the government tends to be lower than their actual prices, and the estimation of the prices can’t even reach ten percentage of the actual prices. As a result, the taxation of property tax is way below the true value of houses. On the other hand, the taxation of income from property transaction is based on the register of actual selling prices(實價登錄) of real estate. Nonetheless, the selling prices provided by current system of registering actual selling prices in Taiwan is the average prices of the other thirty houses surrounding the house, which is so-called de-identification, meaning if the actual value of the house is much higher than those houses, the tax imposed by the government will be dragged down by the prices of them.
-- Reason No. 2:
Secondly, since 2009, estate and gift tax (遺贈稅) is reduced from fifty percent into ten percent. According to the article proposed in Econometrica, “Le Capital au XXIe siècle,” the author, Thomas Piketty (2013) stated that the most suitable estate and gift tax is between fifty to sixty percent. Also, the academician of Academia Sinica(中央研究院), Chu Jing Yi (2014) once said, “After the reduction of estate and gift tax, although the investment of real estates in Taiwan has increased, unfortunately, the high house prices have also caused serious poverty gap.” The low taxation of estate and gift gives the heirs of descendant houses the opportunity to occupy houses or speculate in housing transaction. Therefore, the amendment of estate and gift tax is essential.
-- Reason No. 3:
Thirdly, because of the convenience of MRT, people incline to buy the houses surrounding MRT. Surely, the house prices will rise up.
-- Reason No. 4:
Lastly, during the trade of pre-sale houses, the speculations of unscrupulous vendors tend to hype up house prices which may be ten thousand or millions higher than first-hand selling prices. Before the construction is finished, the constructors will open the sale of these houses, which are so-called pre-sale houses. Then the buyers of these pre-sale houses can get a piece of paper, which is so-called “red paper(紅單),” to approve their rights to selling these houses. With this piece of red paper, they can resell these pre-sale houses with higher prices to earn the variations of prices which lead to high house prices in Taiwan. From the above, we can understand these four reasons causing high house prices in Taiwan and how crucial the issue is. Hence the government in Taiwan proposed three possible solutions in recent years and tries to deal with the issue of high house prices. In the following, I provide three solutions to tackle with these issues. The first solution is specifically targeted at the problems caused by the first and fourth reasons.
Solutions:
-- The first solution to underestimation of house prices and speculation of pre-sale houses: registering actual selling prices
First of all, in order
to deal with underestimation
of house prices and realize
price transparency in real
estate market, the
government launched the
policy of registering actual
selling prices(實價登錄).
When registering the
transaction of houses, the
buyer and the seller have to
register the actual trading
prices together at the same
time to certify authenticity
of the prices mutually. If committing fraud of registering deceitful information, including prices, area, and so on, the seller and the buyer have to pay a fine from six thousand to one hundred and fifty thousand NT dollars (registering actual selling prices, table 2). With the implementation of this policy, the government can possibly avoid sellers of real estate from cheating and providing the public with higher house prices. Before buying a house, the buyer can check the “approximate” price previously and do their best to prevent unreasonable hypes. However, the register of house prices will be published under de-identification, which is mentioned in the second paragraph, and the manifestation of house prices will be the average of the other thirty houses surrounded it. In other words, the buyer isn’t able to get to know the exact house price. The prices of houses with lower value may be elevated by the other houses with higher prices. The sellers still have the opportunity to cheat on this point. According to the policy of registering actual selling prices, I launched a survey in order to know if the government reveals the actual address of trading houses rather than public approximate house prices under de-identification, it will cause privacy problems or not. Based on the survey result (chart 1), 71.4 percent of participants felt concerned about revealing the actual address of trading houses. One of the participants considered revealing the actual address will result in information security problem; however, she also added that as long as the government practices regarding laws to protect these information and regulate the access to them properly, the actual address can still be published. As a matter of fact, according to a research conducted by New Taipei City (2015), it mentions that Britain, which has the best information transparency in worldwide real estate markets, also practices the same method, which was similar to what the participant said. In Britain, people can search Transaction data(交易資訊) and Price Paid Data(價購資訊) of houses on the Internet. They can also submit named application to any departments of the government to apply the information they need. However, the information having privacy and information security concerns will be protected by Data Protection Act 1998(資訊保護法案1998). British citizen can get the access to transparent house prices and be protected by the law at the same time. Moreover, a participant who agreed with revealing address said that compared to the other information security problems, revealing address isn’t a big deal. Although the answer sounds negative, indeed, most of the time, we will receive piles of ads from companies we don’t know. Even if these companies somehow can gain your address, people don’t seem to be worried. Therefore, revealing addresses for lowering house prices won’t be a big deal. Apart from the flaws of de-identification, current policies also can’t strictly regulate the exploitation from transaction of pre-sale houses. As was explained above, the person who has “red paper” can possess the right to sell unfinished houses beforehand and earn massive price variations. According to current policies, the firsthand prices of these pre-sale houses don’t have to be registered until the construction of these houses is completed. However, a construction can take ten or more years to be done. When the actual house prices are finally published, the actual buyer may have already been deceived. Thus, the regulation relating to pre-sale houses should be modified, and the government has to take action to suppress the speculation of pre-sale houses. To conclude, this policy should be improved through following the example of the other countries such as Britain to realize the transparency of price and regulate stricter punishments on speculations of pre-sale houses.
Table 2
Chart 1
-- The second solution to the reduction of estate and gift tax: extra house tax
Secondly, to force the owners
of extra houses to release their
houses and resolve the problems
brought by the reduction of estate
and gift tax, the government has
proposed implement extra house
tax(囤房稅). As the regulation of
property tax mentioned above, in
2004, the Ministry of Finance
(財務部) imposed that the tax rate of
property tax is 1.2 or around 1.5 to
3.6 percent. To illustrate, if a citizen
possesses houses which are used by
him in person, his spouse, or his
lineal relatives as dwelling, the tax
rate of houses will be 1.2 percent.
Besides, if the houses are rented
out, the landlord of excessive houses can pay the tax with the tax rate of 1.2 percent as well. As for those citizens who have excessive houses which are not rented out or used by him in person, his spouse, or lineal relatives as dwelling, they have to pay for 1.5 to 3.6 percentage of property tax which is leaved to local government to adjust. The higher tax rate towards extra houses ranging from 1.5 to 3.6 percent is so-called extra house tax (extra house tax by the government, picture 3). The intention of this policy is to make use of the higher taxation to force the owners with excessive empty houses to release their houses. However, most of the local governments don’t adjust the taxation towards the owners of extra empty houses. They evenly impose 1.5 taxation on every extra house. There are only three local governments that have elevated the taxation of extra houses. As a result, the cost of possessing extra houses is still too low to threaten the people who keep extra houses deliberately. In an interview reported by TVBS無線衛星電視台 (2019), Peng Yang Kai彭揚凱, who is the secretary-general of OURs專業者都市改革組織, once said, “I can assure you that property tax is certainly cheaper than vehicle license tax牌照稅 and fuel tax燃料稅 that you pay annually for caring a car.” Peng indicates that most of the people would rather keeping extra houses under low taxation than selling or renting out their houses with lower prices. To improve the policy, New Power Party時代力量 brought up a proposal. The members of the party suggest that the government should lower the tax rate of the owner’s first house from 1.2 into 1 percent and regulate the tax rate for the second or third houses to be 1.2 percent. As for those people who have more than four houses, unless they can approve these houses are rented out or for dwelling purpose, their tax rate of extra house tax will be ascended from 2.4 to 10 percent gradually and respectively (extra house tax by New Power Party, picture 4). However, lowering the tax rate of taxation for people who have one house means to cut down the major financial resource of local government. According to the statistics provided by Financial Information Agency of Ministry of Finance財政部財政資訊中心 (2018), people who have one house needs to pay 38.28 percent of national property tax. In other words, if the proposal passes, the local government will definitely lose a huge amount of financial income. Besides, as a matter of fact, it’s difficult for the government to identify whether the house is correspondent to the qualification of 1 percent of tax rate. The owners of houses can register their houses under other people’s name and pretend to be qualified to have one percent of tax rate. Additionally, numerous people possess extra houses unwillingly. Although they want to sell or rent out the houses, they can’t sell or rent the houses out because of bad location or lack of renovation. Moreover, the elevation of tax rate will be highly possible to cause the elevation of rent or house prices which is against the intention of lowering house prices. Based on my survey result, 82 percent of participants think it is inevitable that the elevation of house tax will definitely cause rents or house prices to ascend. In short, according to the reasons above, although New Power Party proposed an amendment to this policy, the extra house tax is still with defects.
Picture 3
Picture 4
-- The third solution to the prosperity of MRT: public housing
Thirdly, the high
house prices brought by
the prosperity of MRT can
possibly be solved by the
policy of public housing.
Originally, public housing
is that the government
built up new houses for
homeless people with
affordable prices due to the sudden increase of population after world war two. However, because of descending birth rate and aging population, the population of Taiwan is decreasing. Taiwan doesn’t need more new houses. The number of current houses is totally sufficient for Taiwanese people. According to the statistics provided by Ministry of the Interior, the number of empty houses in Taiwan (2018) is 916,383, and 78,063 of them are waiting to be sold (2019). (empty houses in Taiwan, table 5) (houses waiting to sell, table 6) Since there are so many empty houses, the government doesn’t build up new houses; instead, they turn to request the owners of those empty houses to be public housing. The government provides various subsidies for landlords. For exchange, landlords will rent out houses with affordable and cheap prices. Moreover, if the government can successfully invite landlords of houses around MRT, the house prices there can be balanced by the cheap prices of public housing. However, in my survey (chart 2), only 25 percent of participants believe that the government can make landlords rent out houses with lower prices by providing subsidies. Therefore, in order to attract more landlords, the government combines the subsidies for public housing with the policy of extra house tax to lower the house prices effectively. As mentioned above, in order to attract more landlords, the government provides various subsidies including the reduction of house price tax and the other regarding taxations of real estate, the subvention for renovation, as well as insurance allowances. (various subsidies provided by government, table 7) Besides, the government will help landlords who choose to rent out with ten percent discount to
find suitable tenants. As for
landlords who rent out their
houses with twenty percent
discount, the government will
not only find them suitable
tenants but also manage the
houses for them during the rent.
Additionally, with the
subvention for renovation,
landlords can renovate their old
houses and attract tenants. As a
result, if the extra house tax can be combined with the subsidies for public housing, facing with the high taxation of extra houses, the landlords may be attracted by the preferential subsidies. Regarding this issue, based on my survey results (chart 3), the number of participants who believe landlords will rent out their houses ascends to 50 percent. Although half of them still hold suspicion to the policy, according to the report of Liberty Times (2020), Ministry of the Interior states that the effect of the first quarter of public housing is outstanding. 91 percent of the participated landlords express their agreements on this policy. Thus, the combination of extra house tax and public housing can help to lower high house prices and provide those people in need with a cozy home.
Tabel 5
Tabel 6
Chart 2
Table 7
Chart 3
Conclusions:
To sum up, the three policies proposed by the government can partially solve the high house prices problems in Taiwan. Firstly, registering actual selling prices can prevent unscrupulous sellers sell the houses to the buyers with higher prices. However, the de-identification system and incomplete regulation towards pre-sale houses provide loopholes for speculations which should be improved. Secondly, extra house tax helps the government to spur the owners of extra houses to release their houses. However, the taxation will not only reflect on the rent but also cause the financial shortage of the government. Thirdly, public housing nowadays helps citizens to rent houses with affordable prices which can balance the high prices around MRT. Besides, accompanying with the policy of extra house tax, the government can attract more landlords to participate the policy of public housing. Although there are still lots of defects in these policies which are not resolved yet, to suppress the high house prices, this is the first crucial step of Taiwan. It is hoped that the government can amend the laws and realize the justice of residence someday.
References
-
Central News Agency中央通訊社. (2019). 房價高不可攀 央行直指4大原因. Retrieved from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201905020298.aspx
-
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan in Taiwan行政院主計總處. (2011. March). The average salary of Taiwanese people. Retrieved from https://earnings.dgbas.gov.tw/view_payroll.aspx
-
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan in Taiwan行政院主計總處. (2020.March). The average salary of Taiwanese people. Retrieved from https://earnings.dgbas.gov.tw/view_payroll.aspx
-
Financial Information Agency of Ministry of Finance, (2018). FY 2018 Taiwan District Amount of House Taxes Use Category Statistical Table107 年度臺閩地區房屋稅使用類別稅額. Retrieved from http://ws.fia.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMS9yZWxmaWxlLzc4OTkvNDY5OC8zM2FhYjBjNC05ZDlkLTQyNDktYTVmNi05M2MzZDhiNjE2MzkucGRm&n=6KGoMTlf6Ie66Zap5Zyw5Y2A5oi%2f5bGL56iF5L2%2f55So6aGe5Yil56iF6aGN57Wx6KiI6KGoX%2bS4reiLsS5wZGY%3d
-
Hua Jing Qun花敬群. (2014). 臺灣不動產稅制改革問題與方向. 財稅研究. 43(5). 61-77.
-
Liberty Times. (2020). 內政部:第一期包租代管5157戶成效好 第二期擬推2萬戶. Retrieved from https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/3080359
-
New Taipei City Xizhi Land Office. (2015). 從各國不動產制度看我國實價登錄. Retrieved from https://www.rde.ntpc.gov.tw/userfiles/ntpc/files/5_%E5%BE%9E%E5%90%84%E5%9C%8B%E4%B8%8D%E5%8B%95%E7%94%A2%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E7%9C%8B%E6%88%91%E5%9C%8B%E5%AF%A6%E5%83%B9%E7%99%BB%E9%8C%84.pdf
-
Numbeo. (2020). Property Prices Index by Country 2020. Retrieved from https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/rankings_by_country.jsp
-
Real estate information platform of Ministry of the Interior. (2018). 六都低度使用(用電)住宅統計. Retrieved from https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0104.aspx.
-
Real estate information platform of Ministry of the Interior. (2019). 六都新建餘屋(待售)住宅統計. Retrieved from https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0104.aspx.
-
Real estate information platform of Ministry of the Interior. (2011~2019). The house price index住宅價格指數. Retrieved from https://pip.moi.gov.tw/V3/E/SCRE0201.aspx
-
Thomas Piketty. (2013). A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation. Econometrica. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA10712
-
The Storm Media. (2014). 朱敬一專欄:《21世紀資本論》導讀與對照(3): 遺產稅的絕對必要. Retrieved from https://www.storm.mg/article/23036
-
TVBS無線衛星電視台. (2019). 【十點不一樣】「養房」比「養車」便宜 政府漠視造就世界少見高房價. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir0ZiVgsLHc